Application for withdrawal of writ petition allowed. Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to raise issues in adjudication proceedings. No opinion on merits expressed.
Application for withdrawal allowed; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to raise issues in adjudication proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~27.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
M/S AKINCHAN DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through Dr. Sushil Kumar Gupta & Mr. Manan Verma, Advocates.
versus
INITIATING OFFICER (NCT OF DELHI) AND ORS.. Respondents Through Mr. Asheesh Jain, Sr. Standing Counsel for respondent No. 1. Mr. Jasmeet Singh, CGSC for Union of India.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH
O R D E R % 20.11.2017
CM No. 41914/2017
This is an application for withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to raise all issues and contentions in the adjudication proceedings.
The application is allowed and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. We clarify that we have not expressed any opinion on merits of the case set up either by the petitioner or the respondents.
The next date of hearing, i.e., 22nd January, 2018 is cancelled.
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.
NOVEMBER 20, 2017 VKR
M/S AKINCHAN DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.
INITIATING OFFICER (NCT OF DELHI) AND ORS.
SANJIV KHANNA
PRATHIBA M. SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
