Disposing of an appeal not pressed on merits, the Court granted the appellant six months to vacate suit premises with a condition to pay agreed charges.
Appellant granted six months time to vacate suit premises on or before 15.1.2017 and to continue paying charges.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
..... Appellant
SOHAN PAL SUMNAKSHAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pawan Kumar Bahl, Advocate with Mr. Veeresh Kumar Sharma, Advocate.
versus
..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rohit Gandhi, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Satvinder Singh, Advocate.
RANJEET SINGH & ANR
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA O R D E R
% 11.07.2016
No.1078/G-4/Genl./DHC dated 6.7.2016.
RSA No.102/2016 page 1 of 2
premises will file his affidavit in the Court within two weeks that he undertakes to vacate the suit premises on or before 15.1.2017 and will continue to pay all charges for use and occupation, electricity charges, water charges etc as were fixed under the agreement with the landlord to the
landlord.
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J
JULY 11, 2016 Ne
RSA No.102/2016
page 2 of 2
Sohan Pal Sumnakshar
Ranjeet Singh & ANR
Valmikij Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
