Order disposing of a contempt petition which was not pressed. Granting liberty to move a fresh application in RSA No.111/2016 for interim relief including removal of goods. No substantive decision on any legal proposition.
Liberty to move necessary application in RSA No.111/2016 for interim relief including removal of goods.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1
VIJAY KUMAR SHARMA & ANR ..... Petitioners Through: Ms. Aishwarya Rao, Advocate.
versus
NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. D.S. Mehandru, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA O R D E R % 11.07.2016
No.1078/G-4/Genl./DHC dated 6.7.2016.
case contempt petition is not pressed inasmuch as RCA No.4/2015 was disposed of and accordingly the applicants, if they want any interim relief including of removal of their goods, will move a necessary application in RSA No.111/2016.
liberty.
JULY 11, 2016/ Ne
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J
VIJAY KUMAR SHARMA & ANR
NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
VALMIKI J MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
