Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors. Vs Om Prakash

The learned counsel for the appellant says that they have in fact paid the respondent in terms of the impugned judgment and decree. In other words, it is the submission of the learned counsel for the appellant that the decree has been satisfied.

¶11

The learned counsel for the respondent says that the entire amount under the impugned judgment and decree has not been received by the respondent.

¶12

Therefore, even according to the counsel for the parties, the issue, which has arisen, in the appeal, is, with regard to the computation of the decretal amount. This is an exercise which the executing court is competent to carry out. Thus the appeal is disposed of, with a direction to the executing court to examine the calculation

¶13

RFA 446/2014 page 1 of 2

¶14

for computation of decretal amount supplied by the parties herein and thereafter, arrive at the decision as to whether or not the decree has been satisfied as contended by the appellants herein.

¶15

For this purpose, the parties and their counsel shall appear before the executing court on 10.02.2016.

¶16

The Registry will despatch a copy of this order to the concerned executing court.

¶17

Dasti.

¶18

RAJIV SHAKDHER, J

¶19

JANUARY 06, 2016 yg

¶20

RFA 446/2014

¶21

page 2 of 2

Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors. v. Om Prakash

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors. v. Om Prakash

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Slh Anwar Patiyal Vs Smt Manju Patiyal

Icici Bank Ltd. Vs Himanshu Tyagi

Icici Bank Ltd. Vs Updesh Nagar

Anil Bhasin Vs Telecommunications Consultants India Limited & Ors.

Sunil Kumar Vs Mahavir Prasad

Anil Kumar Vs Laxmi Nagar & Ors.