As an interim order in FAO 4/2016, an appeal was dismissed as withdrawn at the instance of the appellant due to the appointment of a receiver by the trial court. The court along conditional exemption also granted.
Condonation of delay allowed; Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; Interim exemption granted; CM No.118/2016 allowed subject to exceptions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~7
ICICI BANK LTD ..... Appellant
Through: Ms. Chetna Bhalla, Advocate
versus
HIMANSHU TYAGI ..... Respondent
Through
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER O R D E R % 05.01.2016
CM No.118/2016 (Exemption)
Allowed subject to just exceptions.
CM No.119/2016 (condonation of delay in re-filing)
This is an application seeking condonation of delay of 49 days in re-filing the appeal.
For the reasons given therein, the delay is condoned and the application is allowed.
FAO 4/2016
The learned counsel for the appellant says that she has instructions to withdraw the appeal as the trial court has, in the interregnum, appointed a receiver.
The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
JANUARY 05, 2016/yg
3 provisions across 3 enactments
ICICI Bank Ltd
Himanshu Tyagi
Rajiv Shakdher
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Rajiv Shakdher
Parties & counsel
