Allowed
Pankaj Bhasin v. Neeraj Bhasin
Delhi HCRFA/425/2015
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The court disposed of the appeal by modifying the impugned judgment and decree in accordance with a Settlement Agreement and a prior order.
What did the court decide?
The impugned judgment and decree are modified in terms of the Settlement Agreement and the order dated 3rd February, 2016.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~11
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- RFA 425/2015 & CM No.11519/2015 (for stay)
¶4
PANKAJ BHASIN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Manu Nayar, Ms. Meenakshi Chopra and Mr. Bhanu, Advs.
¶5
Versus
¶6
NEERAJ BHASIN ..... Respondent Through: None.
¶7
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW O R D E R
¶8
% 17.02.2016
¶9
- This order is in continuation of the earlier order dated 3rd February, 2016.
¶10
- None appears for the respondent.
¶11
- The counsel for the appellant however states that the respondent has executed and registered the Deed of Relinquishment on 5th February, 2016.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
PANKAJ BHASIN
- respondent
NEERAJ BHASIN
Coram
AI extract
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court