Petitioner sought mandamus to return original documents. Respondent counsel stated petition is false and frivolous, alleging documents were fabricated for duty drawback. Court dismissed petition in default due to non-appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2.
versus
IDBI BANK LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Dr. V.P. Juneja, Adv. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
O R D E R % 18.02.2016
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J
FEBRUARY 18, 2016
‘gsr’..
M/s. G&S International
IDBI Bank Ltd.
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
