Mohd Jasim v. Usha Gautam
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court disposed of an appeal and related applications following a mediation settlement where the appellant vacated premises upon receipt of Rs 4 lacs and the respondent agreed to withdraw the execution petition.
What did the court decide?
Disposal of the appeal and pending applications; parties to bear their own expenses.
What the court decided
$~16.
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- RFA 188/2016 and CM APPL. 12143-44/2016
MOHD JASIM ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Isha Khanna, Advocate with appellant in person.
versus
USHA GAUTAM ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vipul Srivastav, Advocate with respondent in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
O R D E R % 08.12.2016
- Pursuant to the parties being referred to mediation, a Settlement Agreement dated 11.11.2016 has been forwarded by the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre, whereunder the terms and conditions of the settlement have been recorded in para 7.
- Counsels for the parties state that the appellant has agreed to vacate the suit premises on receipt of Rs.4 lacs from the respondent. Counsel for the appellant states that she has brought the keys of the suit premises, which are handed over to the respondent through counsel. Counsel for the respondent hands over two drafts bearing No.501983 dated 07.12.2016 drawn on ICICI Bank, Connaught Place and No.982914 dated 07.12.2016 drawn on Oriental Bank of Commerce, Uttam Nagar, for Rs.1 lac and Rs.2 lac respectively. Both the parties confirm that the appellant has already
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the execution petition and appeal should be disposed of following a settlement.
Whether the respondent needs to be bound to withdraw the execution petition as per settlement.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mohd Jasim
- respondent
Usha Gautam
Coram
Hima Kohli
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court