Disposed

Nikhil Yadav v. University of Delhi & Ors.

Delhi HC8 Dec 2016W.P.(C)/11232/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this continuation of the writ petition regarding DIU election results, the High Court directed respondents to furnish minutes of the Appellate Committee within two weeks and then disposed of the petition, granting liberty to challenge the final Appellate Committee order.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed with liberty to assail the Appellate Committee order; applicants directed to furnish minutes within two weeks.

Nikhil Yadav Vs University of Delhi & Ors. — Education and Admissions | Delhi HC (2016)

¶1

$~1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 11232/2016 & CM 43964/2016

¶4

NIKHIL YADAV ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Amit Khemka, Advocate

¶5

versus

¶6

UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through : Ms. Simran Jeet, proxy counsel for Mr. Mahinder J.S. Rupal, Advocate for R-1 to 4.

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI

¶9

O R D E R

¶10

% 08.12.2016

¶11

This order is in continuation of the order dated 28.11.2016, on which date, counsel for the respondents No.1 to 4 had sought time to obtain instructions from the University with regard to the fate of the appeal, if any, preferred by the petitioner against the decisions dated 16.9.2016 of the Grievance Redressal Cell of the Delhi University, declining to interfere in the results of the DUSU Election 2016-17.

¶12

Today, proxy counsel appearing for counsel for respondents No.1 to 4 hands over a copy of the letter dated 2.12.2016 addressed by the Joint Registrar (Academic) to the petitioner intimating him that the Appellate Committee constituted by the Vice Chancellor, Delhi University to examine the appeal of the petitioner, has unanimously concluded that it has no merit and as a result, the same stands dismissed. The said letter is taken on record, with a copy to the counsel for the petitioner.

¶13

Page 1 of 2

¶14

W.P.(C) 11232/2016

¶15

Counsel for the petitioner submits that the minutes of the meeting of the Appellate Committee have not been enclosed with the communication dated 2.12.2016 and in the absence of any reasons, the petitioner will not be in a position to assail the said order. He submits that the respondent may be directed to furnish the minutes/report of the Appellate Committee to enable the petitioner to challenge the same in accordance with law.

¶16

Needful shall be done by the respondents within two weeks.

¶17

The petition is disposed of, along with the pending application, with liberty granted to the petitioner to assail the order passed by the Appellate Committee of the respondents, in accordance with law.

¶18

HIMA KOHLI, J
DECEMBER 08, 2016
sk

¶19

Page 2 of 2

¶20

W.P.(C) 11232/2016

Nikhil Yadav v. University of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nikhil Yadav v. University of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vishal Hira Merchant Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Vs Hdfc Bank Ltd.

UOI & Anr. Vs Daya Shankar

Vyanjana Vs the Chairman, C.B.S.E. & Anr.

Aditya Srivastav Vs Central Board of Secondary Education and Anr.

Mohd. Faizan Vs North Delhi Municipal Corporation and Anr.

Mehkar Singh Vs Indian Law Institute and Ors.

Vikas Kumar Chawla and Ors. Vs Gnct of Delhi and Ors.

Rohit Chopra Vs the Chairman Maulana Azad Institute of Dental Sciences and Ors.

Delhi Tourism & Transportation Development Corporation Ltd. Vs Chander Prakash Gupta

Aneeta Varma & Ors. Vs PNB & Ors.

Service and Justice for Sikh Society (Regd.) Vs Lt. Governor of Delhi & Ors.

Ramjee Singh Vs the Union of India through Its Secretary, Department of Ayush, Govt. of India & Ors.

Mohd Jasim Vs Usha Gautam

Amit Goyal Vs Federation of Indian Export Organization and Ors.