Disposed
Akshma Devi v. Jagdish & Ors.
Delhi HCRC.REV./58/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~A-39
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
AKSHMA DEVI .... Petitioner Through Mr.Aneesh Jain, Advocate. versus JAGDISH & ORS ..... Respondents Through
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH
O R D E R % 04.10.2016 CM No. 36964/2016 (for correction)
By the present application, the petitioner seeks correction of certain typographical errors in judgment dated 29.08.2016.
It is pointed that in para 2, the address of the property is mentioned as “3820-3830, Arya Samaj Road, Regarpura, Karol Bagh, New Delhi-5”. It is submitted that the same may be read as “3827-3830, Arya Samaj Road, Regarpura, Karol Bagh, New Delhi-5”.
It is further stated that in various paras, there is a reference to “respondent” whereas it should be “respondents”.
The application is allowed and the corrections may be read as part of the order dated 29.08.2016.
JAYANT NATH, J
OCTOBER 04, 2016 rb
Akshma Devi
Jagdish & Ors
Jayant Nath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court