Sonia Rai v. Bihari Lal
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Delhi dismissed a petition filed by Sonia Rai against Bhari Lal in default, noting the petitioner's absence and non-payment of process fee.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed in default; all pending applications disposed of.
What the court decided
$~A-13
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- C.R.P. 62/2016
SONIA RAI ..... Petitioner Through None versus BIHARI LAL ..... Respondent Through Mr.Vineet Jain, Adv.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH
O R D E R % 04.10.2016
Learned counsel for the respondent states that possession of the property has already been taken over in July 2016. None is present for the petitioner. On the last date notice was issued but no process fee has also been filed. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the petition.
Petition is dismissed in default. All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of accordingly.
JAYANT NATH, J
OCTOBER 04, 2016 rb
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SONIA RAI
- respondent
BIHARI LAL
Coram
JAYANT NATH
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court