The petitioner, a Gaushala, sought permission to withdraw a petition (CM(M) 290/2013). The High Court of Delhi granted the request and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the petition was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~9
..... Petitioner Through Mr.P.K.Bhardwaj, Advocate.
versus
SAGIR MALIK
..... Respondent Through Mr.Amit Gupta, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
Learned counsel for the petitioner under instructions seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
INDERMEET KAUR, J
FEBRUARY 11, 2016 ndn
GAUSHALA, MEHROLI DEHAT
SAGIR MALIK
INDERMEET KAUR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
