Pooja v. Deepak Gautam
Case brief
What is this about?
The appeal was disposed of as the parties settled their dispute through mediation, with the respondent paying court-accepted amounts and undertaking future obligations as per the settlement agreement.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was disposed of in terms of the settlement agreement executed on 5th February, 2016.
What the court decided
$~2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAT.APP. 49/2009 POOJA ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Beenashan N. Soni, Adv. along with appellant in person. versus DEEPAK GAUTAM ..... Respondent Through: Mr. P.R. Chopra, Adv. along with respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK O R D E R % 09.02.2016
Parties have settled their disputes through the process of mediation before the Delhi High Court Mediation & Conciliation Centre on 5th February, 2016 vide settlement agreement, which is marked as Mark ‘C-1’. Mark ‘C-1’ is signed by the parties, their respective counsel as well as learned Mediator. Parties shall remain bound by the terms of settlement as stipulated in Mark ‘C-1’. In terms of para 7(b) of the Mark ‘C-1’, respondent has paid 4.50 lacs to the appellant today in Court vide demand draft, photocopy whereof has been placed on record. Respondent has also paid two post dated cheques for 4.50 lacs dated 9th March, 2016 and `6 lacs dated 9th August, 2016 both drawn on Punjab National Bank, 352, Main Road, Ghonda, Delhi, in terms of para 7(c) and (d), which have been dully
accepted by the appellant, subject to their realisation. Respondent, who is present in Court, assures that the post dated cheques would be honoured on presentation. Respondent also undertakes to supply photocopy of OBC certificate to the appellant within one week.
Appeal is disposed of in terms of Mark ‘C-1’.
A.K. PATHAK, J.
FEBRUARY 09, 2016 ga
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Pooja
- respondent
Deepak Gautam
Coram
A.K. Pathak
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court