Single-paragraph order allowing an appellant's application for release of a fixed deposit by a bank and directing the bank to release the funds.
Directing UCO Bank to release the share of appellant No.2 in the fixed deposit in favour of appellant No.1 as per rules.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~4
BAIJ NATH SINGH & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Manish Maini, Advocate
Versus
VIJENDER KUMAR @ VIJAY & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
O R D E R
%
02.12.2016
C.M.No. 31091/2016 (u/S 151 CPC)
By this application, applicant-appellant No.1 seeks release of the fixed deposit amount in the name of appellant No.2 lying deposited in the UCO Bank, Delhi High Court Branch, New Delhi.
Upon notice, Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate for respondent-insurer, submits that there is no objection if this application is allowed.
This application accordingly allowed and UCO Bank, Delhi High Court branch is directed to release the share of appellant No.2 in favour of appellant No.1 as per rules.
The application is disposed of.
SUNIL GAUR, J
DECEMBER 02, 2016
r
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Baij Nath Singh & Ors.
Vijender Kumar @ Vijay & Ors.
Sunil Gaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
