Recognising petitioners' application as withdrawn sets aside an order dismissing their request for release of a fixed deposit receipt pending disposal of related appeal.
Application dismissed as withdrawn; liberty to file application in the disposed of appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~40
DR INDU BALA & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Peeush Sharma, Advocate
Versus
UTTAR PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORTATION & ORS ..... Respondents
Through: Nemo.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
O R D E R % 02.12.2016
In this appeal, petitioners are seeking setting aside of order of 1st September, 2016 vide which petitioners’ application seeking release of fixed deposit receipt in the name of deceased Ashima Singh has been dismissed on the ground that the appeal against the impugned Award of 14th May, 2007 was decided by this Court.
Upon hearing, this petition and application are dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to petitioners to file an application before this Court in the disposed of appeal.
SUNIL GAUR, J
DECEMBER 02, 2016
r
Page | 1
Dr Indu Bala & Ors.
Uttar Pradesh State Road Transportation & Ors.
Sunil Gaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
