Single Judge allowed exemption appeals and disposed of an appeal regarding reinstatement. The Court noted the writ petition's age (2006) and directed expedited disposal by the Single Judge without interfering with the impugned order.
Exemption allowed; appeal disposed with direction for expeditious disposal of underlying W.P.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~21
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
RAM MEHER ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal with Mr. Sachin Kumar, Advs.
Versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent Through: None.
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH
O R D E R
%
06.12.2016
CM No.45286/2016 (exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
LPA No.674/2016 & CM No.45285/2016 (delay in filing)
The respondent No.1 in W.P.(C) No.12951/2006 filed this appeal aggrieved by the dismissal of CM No.25403/2016 wherein he prayed for reinstatement into service.
Having heard the learned counsel for the appellant, though we do not find any justifiable reason to interfere with the order under appeal, having regard to the fact that the writ petition is of the year 2006, we consider it appropriate to direct expeditious disposal of the writ petition.
Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of with a direction to list W.P.(C) No.12951/2006 before the Roster Bench on 09.01.2017 for directions.
We request the learned Single Judge to hear both the parties and dispose of the writ petition as expeditiously as possible. The date, if any,
fixed in the writ petition shall stand cancelled.
CHIEF JUSTICE
JAYANT NATH, J
DECEMBER 06, 2016 kks
2 issues framed by the court
Whether there are justifiable reasons for interfering with the order dismissing the prayer for reinstatement.
Whether to direct expedited disposal of the underlying writ petition given its age.
RAM MEHER
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
JAYANT NATH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
