The High Court of Delhi allowed the writ petition without costs, directing reference to a detailed judgment dated 02.12.2016 in W.P.(C) 250/2009 for detailed reasoning. The decretum is a one-line order.
Petition allowed without any order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Reserved on: 22.04.2016 Pronounced on: 02.12.2016
+ W.P.(C) 7102/2011, C.M. APPL.16215/2011 & 18367/2012 KAVERI SEED COMPANY LTD. ……Petitioner
Versus
REGISTRAR OF PLANT VARIETIES AND ANR..…..Respondents Through: Sh. Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Abhishek Saket, Ms. Vijaya Singh and Sh. Manish Madhukar, Advocates, for petitioner. Sh. Pravin Anand with Ms. Geetanjali Viswanathan, Ms. Neeti Wilson and Ms. Asavari Jain, Advocates, for interveners.
Sh. Anil Dutt and Sh. Sudershan. S. Sekhawat, Advocates, for Maharashtra Hybrid Seed Co. Ltd. Sh. Dev. P. Bhardwaj, CGSC with Ms. Anubha Bhardwaj, Advocate, for UOI, in W.P.(C) 7102/2011.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. GAUBA
MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
%
The writ petition is allowed without any order as to costs.
For detailed judgment, the decision dated 02.12.2016 in W.P.(C) 250/2009 may be referred to.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT (JUDGE)
R.K. GAUBA (JUDGE)
DECEMBER 2, 2016
W.P.(C) 7102/2011
Page 1
Kaveri Seed Company Ltd.
Registrar of Plant Varieties and Anr.
S. Ravindra Bhat
R.K. Gauba
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
