Appeal by Tata Teleservices Limited was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file appropriate proceedings. A stay petition was also disposed of with exemption allowed subject to exceptions.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; liberty to file appropriate proceedings; exemption allowed subject to exceptions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~37
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
TATA TELESERVICES LIMITED AND ANR ..... Appellants
Through Mr Iqbal M. Chagla, Sr Advocate and Mr Ramji Srinivasan, Sr Advocate with Mr Mansoor Ali Shokat, Ms Vibha Dhawan and Mr Kunal Singh, Advocates.
versus
GTL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED AND ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr Rajiv Nayar, Sr Advocate wtih Ms Shyel Trehan and Mr Harikrishna Pramod, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA O R D E R % 17.03.2016
CMNo.9507/2016 (exemption)
Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.
FAO(OS) (COMM) 5/2016 & CMNo.9506/2016 (stay), CAV. 256/2016
The learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw this appeal with liberty to file appropriate proceedings before an appropriate Court. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
MARCH 17, 2016 st
3 provisions across 3 enactments
TATA TELESERVICES LIMITED
GTL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED
BADAR DURREZ AHMED
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
