M/S Cmi Limited v. Union of India & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition. The High Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn. Exemption in the connected matter was allowed subject to exceptions.
What the court decided
$~40
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(C) 2067/2016 M/S CMI LIMITED ..... Petitioner
Through Mr Sudhir Sukhija, Advocate.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr Rajesh Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr Vaibhav Gaggar with Ms Sumedha Dang, Advocates for Telecom Equipment Manufacturers Association.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA O R D E R % 18.03.2016
CM No.8887/2016 (exemption)
Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.
W.P.(C) 2067/2016 & CM No.8886/2016 (stay)
The learned counsel for the petitioner states that he has instructions to withdraw this writ petition.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M/S CMI LIMITED
- respondent
UNION OF INDIA
Coram
BADAR DURREZ AHMED
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court