The appellant, Panache Media, applied to withdraw their appeal. The court granted the withdrawal and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn. A concurrent application for an interim stay was dismissed as infructuous.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; interim stay application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~14
PANACHE MEDIA ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Pankaj Kapoor, Mr.Harsh Kalta, Advs. versus
CHITRA SINGH AND ORS. ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms.Pratibha M.Singh, Sr.Adv. instructed by Ms.Mahua Roy Choudhury, Mr.Sanjay Visen, Mr.Devanshu Khanna, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R % 18.03.2016 CM 10337/2016
Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions.
FAO(OS)(COMM) 7/2016
FAO(OS)(COMM) 7/2016 page 1 of 2
CM 10336/2016 (stay)
PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
MARCH 18, 2016 ‘ga’
page 2 of 2
FAO(OS)(COMM) 7/2016
Panache Media
Chitra Singh and Ors.
Pradeep Nandrajog
Mukta Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
