The High Court dismissed two withdrawn writ petitions but permitted the petitioners to file fresh petitions regarding the challenged orders, extending the interim stay by three weeks.
Petitions allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petitions; interim stay extended by three weeks; No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified Signed By:RAM DATT Signing Date:01.10.2024 16:36 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file an d no page is missing.
would be useless to permit amendment.Correctcourse should be to permit the petitionsto be withdrawnwith liberty grantedto file fresh petitionson the same cause challengingthe orders which have been challengedby the petitionersin the two captionedpetitions.
.-r— Y->N^
PRADEEPNANDk^OG, J
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
MARCH 17,2016
'skb'
\
W.P.(C) 7591/2015& W.P. (C) 10734/2015
page 2 of2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow withdrawal of the two writ petitions with liberty to file fresh petitions on the same cause of action?
PRADEEP NANDLAL OG
MUKTA GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
