The High Court of Delhi dismissed an appeal filed by Heinz India Private Limited against a suit compromising settlement as the appeal was withdrawn by the counsel.
Dismissal of the appeal as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~6
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
HEINZ INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR ..... Appellants
Through : Mr Sumit Wadhwa, Advocate.
versus
STOKELY VAN CAMP INC. & ANR ..... Respondents Through : Mr Dheeraj Nair and Mr Kunal Mimani, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA O R D E R
% 11.02.2016
FAO(OS) 493/2012 & CM Nos.17886/2012(stay), 5152/2016(O.XXIII R.1 CPC)
The learned counsel for the appellants states that he has instructions to withdraw
this appeal inasmuch as the suit has already been compromised and settled.
The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
FEBRUARY 11, 2016 ‘sn’
Heinz India Private Limited
Stokely Van Camp Inc.
Badar Durrez Ahmed
Sanjeev Sachdeva
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal to a Division Bench against an order made by a single judge on the original side of the High Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
