Appeal against an order requiring the appellant to deposit security for an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The bench found no infirmity in the order and dismissed the appeal.
The application for appointing an arbitrator was dismissed; costs to respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
SHANKAR DASS ..... Appellant
Represented by: Appellant in person.
versus
MAHINDER ACHDEVA ..... Respondent Represented by: None.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI
O R D E R
% 09.08.2016
CM No.8304/2016
The appeal is listed for hearing today and we are deciding it today therefore the instant application which prays for an actual date of hearing to be fixed is dismissed as infructuous. CM No.13247/2009
Since the appeal is being disposed of today the instant application is dismissed as infructuous.
FAO(OS) 417/2009
the respondent. The respondent denied his signature on the receipts.
PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.
PRATIBHA RANI, J.
AUGUST 09, 2016 ‘st’
Page 2 of 2
FAO(OS) 417/2009
Shankar Dass
Mahinder Achdeva
Pradeep Nandrajog
Pratibha Rani
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal to a Division Bench against an order made by a single judge on the original side of the High Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
