Writ petition seeking extension of time dismissed; no grounds found as premises were subjected to detention in 2010.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~51
A.K. CHAUDHARY ..... Petitioner
Through: None.
versus
COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL EXCISE, DELHI-I COMMISSIONERATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr Pramod Kumar Rai and Mr Deepak Anand, Advs. for applicant
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA
O R D E R % 07.11.2016 CM No. 41234/2016
No ground is made out for granting extension of time considering the premises were subjected to detention in 2010.
The application is dismissed.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
DEEPA SHARMA, J
NOVEMBER 07, 2016 bg
A.K. Chaudhary
Commissioner, Central Excise, Delhi-I Commissionerate
S. Ravindra Bhat
Deepa Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
