Short coram order disposing an application. The High Court of Delhi heard arguments and fixed a hearing date for video conferencing before disposing of the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~80
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SANJAY KRIPLANI ..... Appellant Through: Mr Arjun Singh Bawa with Ms Ambika Vohra, Advs.
versus
M/S FOUNTAINHEAD MOTEL PVT LTD & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr Vedanta Varma with Mr Vibhor Kush, Advs.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR O R D E R % 27.02.2017
CM No.7942/2017 in FAO(OS) 298/2016
We have heard the learned counsel for the appellant as also the learned counsel for respondent nos.2 and 3. We do not deem it necessary to issue notice to the other respondents in view of the directions that we are giving.
The matter be placed before the concerned Joint Registrar on 07.03.2017 for fixing the date for video conferencing, preferably in the third week of March, 2017.
The application stands disposed of.
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J
ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J
FEBRUARY 27, 2017 ns
SANJAY KRIPLANI
M/S FOUNTAINHEAD MOTEL PVT LTD
ORS
BADAR DURREZ AHMED
ASHUTOSH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal to a Division Bench against an order made by a single judge on the original side of the High Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
