Dismissed
Aerjun v. Tek Chand & Ors.
Delhi HCFAO/91/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~24
versus TEK CHAND & ORS ..... Respondent Through Mr.Shiv Charan Garg, Advocate for R-1&2 Mr.Satyakam, Standing counsel for GNCTD with Mr.Naveen Jakhar, Advocate along with ASI Raju Yadav, PS Adarsh Nagar for R-41 & 42
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA
O R D E R % 02.12.2016
None appears for the appellant despite pass-over twice.
Respondent No.2 has already filed an application for disposal of the appeal on the ground that even the main suit has been rejected under Order 7 Rule 10/11 CPC vide order dated 11th November, 2016 and, therefore, nothing survives in this appeal.
Since none has appeared for the appellant, the appeal is dismissed in default as well as for non-prosecution.
SUNITA GUPTA, J
DECEMBER 02, 2016
rs
AERJUN
TEK CHAND & ORS
SUNITA GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court