Plaintiffs permitted to withdraw suit after partial decree; suit for balance amount dismissed accordingly. Application to replace originals with certified copies allowed and disposed of.
Suit for balance amount dismissed as withdrawn; application for substituting documents with certified copies allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~12.
RAM KUMAR SINGH & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Sudipto Sircar & Mr. Pramod Kumar Singh, Advocates.
versus
SHRI IRSHAD ALAM ..... Defendant
Through:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI
%
O R D E R 04.03.2016
Learned counsel for the plaintiffs, on instructions, states that the plaintiffs wish to withdraw the suit since the partial decree already stands passed on 13.10.2015.
Accordingly, the suit in respect of the balance amount stands dismissed as withdrawn.
I.A. No. 2601/2016
The plaintiffs are permitted to substitute the original documents placed on record with certified copies. Upon the same being substituted, the original documents be returned to the plaintiffs.
The application stands disposed of.
VIPIN SANGHI, J
MARCH 04, 2016
B.S. Rohella
VIPIN SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
A civil suit filed on the original side of a High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
