High Court of Delhi accepted a joint settlement application under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC to dispose of suit CS(OS) 462/2005 as settled after verifying terms through affidavits.
Suit disposed of as settled in terms of the signed settlement agreement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~37.
versus
TODI INVESTORS ..... Defendant Through: Ms. Samreen Khan, Advocate
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI
O R D E R
% 03.03.2016
I.A. No.3000/2016
This application has been jointly moved by the parties under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC to record their settlement. The same has been signed by the parties and their respective counsels and is also supported by the affidavit of constituted attorney of plaintiff. It is also supported by the affidavit of the authorised representative of the defendant.
The terms of the settlement appear to be fair, just and reasonable and I see no impediment in accepting the same. Accordingly, the suit stands disposed of as settled in terms of the settlement. The parties shall remain bound by the said settlement.
VIPIN SANGHI, J
MARCH 03, 2016
sr
1 provisions across 1 enactments
VIPIN SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
A civil suit filed on the original side of a High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
