Order transferring a civil suit to the District & Sessions Judge (West), Tis Hazari Courts due to lack of pecuniary jurisdiction by the Delhi High Court under Section 4 of the Delhi High Court (Amendment) Act, 2015.
Suit transferred to District & Sessions Judge (West), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi; parties directed to appear on 28th March 2016.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~30
RAVINDER SINGH MAJITHIA & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Sunil Malhotra and Mr. Amit Sanduja, Advocates
versus
JHARMAL SINGH & ANR ..... Defendants
Through:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA O R D E R
% 10.02.2016
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J
FEBRUARY 10, 2016 /hkaur
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the Court has pecuniary jurisdiction to try the suit based on the Office Order dated 24.11.2015
To which Court has the suit been transferred for decision due to lack of jurisdiction
Whether parties shall appear before the designated District & Sessions Judge
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Valmiki J. Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
A civil suit filed on the original side of a High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
