Petitioner withdrew the writ petition stating that action taken by the respondent corporation made further pursuit unnecessary.
Petition disposed as not pressed; miscellaneous applications disposed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~26
versus
EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through :SI Amit Verma, P.S. Gokalpuri for respondent no. 4 Mr. Sunil Kumar, Adv. for respondent no. 6
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK
O R D E R % 12.01.2016
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since action has been
taken by the East Delhi Municipal Corporation, petitioner is not willing to
pursue this matter any further.
Disposed of as not pressed. Miscellaneous applications are disposed
of as infructuous.
A.K. PATHAK, J.
JANUARY 12, 2016 rb
MAHRAJ SINGH
EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS.
A.K. PATHAK
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
