The Delhi High Court ordered transfer of the suit and pending applications to the District and Sessions Judge (North West) Rohini Courts due to lack of pecuniary jurisdiction and residence of defendants outside Delhi.
Transfer of suit and applications to District and Sessions Judge (North West) Rohini Courts.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~44 & 45
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MR.PAUL (RICHARD) BERKOWITZ ..... Plaintiff Through: Ms. Prity Sharma and Ms. Nauras Sahrawardy, Advocates. versus RAJIB SAHAH & NAR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Abhishek Malhotra, Mr. Ankit Chatrubadi and Mr. Rijul Taneja, Advocates. + EX.P. 196/2013 & E.As 512/2013 (O 21 R 41 CPC by DH) & 513/2013 (O 21 R 11 CPC by DH)
PAUL BERKOWITZ ..... Decree Holder Through: Ms. Prity Sharma and Ms. Nauras Sahrawardy, Advocates. versus RAJIB SAHAH & ANR. ..... Judgement Debtors Through: Mr. Abhishek Malhotra, Mr. Ankit Chatrubadi and Mr. Rijul Taneja, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA O R D E R % 10.02.2016
cannot be tried by this Court and commercial matters up to the value of rupees one crore cannot be tried by this Court, this suit is transferred for decision to the concerned jurisdictional Court.
and 2 in CS(OS) No. 441/2008.
to try the present matter, application under Order 37 Rule 4 CPC filed by the defendants will be decided by the concerned transferee court.
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J
FEBRUARY 10, 2016 ib
Rajib Saha
Nar
Valmiki J. Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
A civil suit filed on the original side of a High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
