A petition filed by Preetam Handloom Cooperative Society Limited was dismissed as the petitioner had not pressed the case, having accepted that the respondents complied with a prior order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~14
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
PREETAM HANDLOOM COOPERATIVE & INDUSTRIAL (PRODUCTION) SOCIETY LIMITED & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajendra Dutt, Advocate
versus
CHETAN V SANGHI COMMISSIONER OF INDUSTRIES & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Siddharth Dutta, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 & 2
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
O R D E R % 09.02.2016
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the respondents have complied with the order dated 12th February, 2015 passed in W.P.(C) 7403/2013 and, therefore, the petitioners do not press this petition.
The petition is dismissed as not pressed.
J.R. MIDHA, J.
FEBRUARY 09, 2016 rsk
PREETAM HANDLOOM COOPERATIVE & INDUSTRIAL (PRODUCTION) SOCIETY LIMITED & ORS
CHETAN V SANGHI COMMISSIONER OF INDUSTRIES & ANR
J.R. MIDHA
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
