Suit settled before Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre. Court ordered refund of court fee to plaintiff no.2. Suit stood disposed of. No party names in summary as per rules.
Suit disposed; court fee refunded to plaintiff no.2 Siemens Industry Software (India) Private Limited.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~28
SIEMENS PRODUCT LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE INC & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Ms.Shruti Baid, Advocate versus MR D SRINIVASAN & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr.B.Vinodh Kanna and Mr.Bala Subramaniam, Advocates for D-1 and D-2. Mr.P.K.Kar, Adv. for D-3 to D-9.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA
O R D E R % 16.11.2016
The matter between the parties stands settled before the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre. It is also settled before the mediation centre that the court fee in terms of Section 89CPC and Section 16 of the Court Fees Act be returned to plaintiff no.2 i.e. Siemens Industry Software (India) Private Limited.
In terms of the settlement between the parties while disposing of the present suit, it is hereby directed that the court fee be refunded in the name of plaintiff no.2 Siemens Industry Software (India) Private Limited.
The suit stands disposed of.
DEEPA SHARMA, J
NOVEMBER 16, 2016 rb
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the suit can be disposed of upon settlement reached through mediation.
Whether court fees paid by the plaintiff should be refunded upon settlement.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
DeePsha Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A suit of a commercial nature above the specified value, governed by the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
