The court disposed of the suit following a settlement agreement received from the Mediation Centre and ordered refund of the court fee.
Settlement agreement enforced; suit and pending applications disposed of; court fee refunded to plaintiff.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~27
..... Plaintiff Through: Ms Gurkamal Hora Arora and Mr Ajay Kumar Arora, Advs.
versus
RIDLEY LIFE SCIENCE PVT LTD. ..... Defendant
Through: Mr Satish Kumar Tripathi, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA
Settlement agreement has been received from the Mediation Centre. The suit stands disposed of in terms of the settlement. As per Section 16 read with Section 89 of the Court Fee Act, court fee be refunded to the plaintiff.
All the pending applications also stand disposed of.
DEEPA SHARMA, J
NOVEMBER 10, 2016 bg
1 provisions across 1 enactments
DEEPA SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
A suit of a commercial nature above the specified value, governed by the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
