Petitioner sought leave to withdraw a criminal revision petition. The court granted the withdrawal, disposed of the revision petition and the miscellaneous application.
Leave to withdraw the revision petition granted;Revision and miscellaneous application disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~38
RAVI KUMAR DUBEY ..... Petitioner Through :Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh and Mr. H.S. Dubey, Advs.
versus
THE STATE GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI..... Respondent Through : Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK O R D E R % 02.12.2016
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has already
completed the sentence and is not willing to pursue the matter. He seeks
leave to withdraw the revision petition. Revision petition is disposed of as
withdrawn. Miscellaneous application is disposed of as infructuous.
A.K. PATHAK, J.
DECEMBER 02, 2016 rb
Ravi Kumar Dubey
Government of NCT of Delhi
A.K. Pathak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
