In CRL.REV.P. 315/2014, the Delhi High Court dismissed a criminal revision petition for non-prosecution as the petitioner remained unrepresented on the hearing dates.
None. The petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~28
MOHD MINTULLAH & ORS ..... Respondents Through : Mr. Charan Singh and Mr. S. C. Sharma, Advs. for R-1. Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP with SI Pankaj Gulliya PS Jamia Nagar.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK O R D E R % 11.11.2016
Matter has been passed over once. Even on the second call, no one
appears for petitioner. On the last date of hearing also, petitioner had remained unrepresented.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
A.K. PATHAK, J.
NOVEMBER 11, 2016/ dk
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal revision petition may be dismissed for want of prosecution?
BILAL ARIF HASAN
MOHD MINTULLAH
A.K. PATHAK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
