Allowed

Bhuwan Chandra Pandey & Anr. v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Delhi HC8 Jan 2016CRL.M.C./66/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order quashes an FIR under Section 509 IPC and Section 23 of the Juvenile Justice Act after an amicable settlement between the parties. The court directed the petitioner to deposit Rs. 20,000 in the Prime Minister's Relief Fund.

What did the court decide?

FIR No. 0497/2015 under Section 509 IPC and Section 23 Juvenile Justice Act quashed; petitioners directed to deposit Rs. 20,000 in PM's Relief Fund.

Bhuwan Chandra Pandey & Anr. Vs State Govt of NCT of Delhi… — Quashing and FIR | Delhi HC (2016)

¶1

$~39

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

CRL.M.C. 66/2016

¶4

BHUWAN CHANDRA PANDEY & ANR .....Petitioners Through Mr. Aditya Aggarwal with Ms.Tanya Aggarwal, Advocates

¶5

versus

¶6

STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR .... Respondents Through Mr. Surendra, Advocate for R-2 Mr. Amit Gupta, APP ASI Parvati, PS Bharat Nagar Father of the complainant, present in person.

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG O R D E R % 08.01.2016

¶9

Crl. M.A. No. 269/2016

¶10

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶11

The application stands disposed of.

¶12

Crl. M.C. No. 66/2016

¶13

The present petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Cr. P.C. for quashing of the FIR No. 0497/2015 registered under Section 509 IPC and Section 23 of the Juvenile Justice Act, 1986 at Police Station Bharat Nagar.

¶14

It is stated that the matter has been amicably settled orally with the complainant/respondent No. 2 on 21.12.2015.

¶15

The father of the Complainant/respondent No. 2, her natural guardian is present and has been identified by the Investigating

¶16

Officer. I have enquired from him if he has settled the dispute on behalf of the victim, her daughter with the petitioners amicably without any fear or pressure. He has informed that all the disputes between the parties have been resolved amicably with their free consent and he has no objection to the quashing of the FIR in question.

¶17

The petition is supported by affidavits of the parties. Since the dispute between the parties has been settled, no useful purpose will be served to continue with the proceedings. In the interest of justice and to enable the parties to put an end to the litigation, FIR No. 0497/2015 registered under Section 509 IPC and Section 23 of the Juvenile Justice Act, 1986 at Police Station Bharat Nagar and all the proceedings arising therefrom are quashed.

¶18

The petitioners are directed to deposit Rs.20,000/- as costs in the Prime Minister’s Relief Fund within two weeks. Registry shall ensure its compliance.

¶19

The petition stands disposed of accordingly. Pending applications also stands disposed of.

¶20

S.P.GARG, J

¶21

JANUARY 08, 2016 P

Bhuwan Chandra Pandey & Anr. v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhuwan Chandra Pandey & Anr. v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hari Mohan Sharma Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Gokul Prasad Vs State NCT of Delhi

Manish Vs State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Vijay Kumar Vs the State NCT of Delhi

Sikander Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Dalbir Singh Vs State