The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the criminal writ petition. The court granted the permission to withdraw and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the petition was granted and the petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~49
SIKANDER ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Sunil Sagar, Advocate
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr.Ashish Aggarwal, ASC with Mr. Peeyush Singhal, Advocate SI Uma Dutt, PS Mangol Puri
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG O R D E R % 08.01.2016
Crl. M A No. 279/2016
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
WP(Crl.) No. 50/2016
(1). Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition.
S.P.GARG, J
JANUARY 08, 2016 P
SIKANDER
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
S.P.GARG
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
