State v. Manoj
Case brief
What is this about?
The applicant, surety for a convicted respondent, sought discharge of his surety bond and return of the FDR. The State had no objection. The court directed the return of the FDR and cancellation of the endorsement lying with the Deputy Registrar.
What did the court decide?
Discharge of surety bond, return of FDR, and cancellation of endorsement on the FDR lying with the Deputy Registrar.
What the court decided
- $~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CRL.A. 483/2000
STATE ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Varun Goswami, APP for the State.
versus
MANOJ ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Tej Ram applicant along with Mr. Ajay Gautam, grandson in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA
O R D E R % 12.08.2016
Crl.M.A.12501/2016 (for release of FDR) in CRL.A. 483/2000
- Notice.
- Mr. Varun Goswami, APP for the State accepts notice. He submis that he has no objection to the grant of the prayer made in this application.
- Mr.Tej Ram, the applicant has submitted that pursuant to the order dated 28.11.2007, he has stood surety for the respondent Manoj and in support of the surety bond, the applicant had tendered an FDR drawn on Indian Bank, Shahdara Branch, New Delhi, which is lying in the safe custody of Deputy Registrar concerned.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant discharge of the surety bond and return of the Financial Deposit Receipt to the applicant.
Whether to direct the cancellation of the endorsement on the financial deposit receipt and intimation to the bank.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
State
- respondent
Manoj
- applicant
Tej Ram
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court