The High Court of Delhi dismissed a writ petition as withdrawn by the petitioner, who agreed to withdraw the challenge to a notice after being advised to respond to the notice under writer recovery officer.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~13
Represented by: Mr.Anil Panwar, Adv.
versus
BANK OF BARODA & ORS ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms.Priyadarshini Verma, Adv. for R-1.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R % 02.02.2016
CM 3632/2016 (stay)
Dismissed as not pressed.
PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
FEBRUARY 02, 2016 /‘ga’
Umang Jain
Bank of Baroda & Ors.
Pradeep Nandrajog
Mukta Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
