The Court allowed a writ petition seeking parole for the petitioner, a life convict, enabling him to file a Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court against his dismissal from this Court, subject to conditions
Petitioner released on parole for 30 days subject to furnishing bond, reporting to police, and surrender at the end of the period.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~10.
KRISHNA SHANKAR BAKDE
..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Vikram Mathrur and Jatin Rajput, Advocates
versus
STATE
..... Respondent Through: Ms. Kamna Vohra, ASC with SI Munish Kumar, PS DBG Road
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI
O R D E R % 02.12.2016
The status report tendered in court is taken on record. The petitioner has preferred the present petition to seek parole so as to enable him to prefer a Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court against the dismissal of his appeal by this Court. The petitioner is a convict in the case FIR 303/2000 under Section 364A/120B IPC. He is undergoing a life sentence. The petitioner has already undergone incarceration for 9 years and 8 days as on 11.10.2016. The nominal roll on record shows that the conduct of the petitioner is satisfactory. The petitioner had provided his local address. As per the status report, none of his relatives reside at the local address. In this regard, the statements of Joginder Pal, s/o Kishori Lal and Kanta Sharma,
w/o Satpal have been referred to in the status report. The petitioner’s home town address at Maharashtra has also been verified.
Ms.Vohra submits that after the preparation of the status report, the said address of the petitioner has also been got verified. His elder brother Vishnu Shankar Wagle is residing with his family at the said address.
In view of the aforesaid, I am inclined to allow the petition. In these circumstances, the petitioner is directed to be released on parole for a period of 30 days subject to:
sr
VIPIN SANGHI, J
DECEMBER 02, 2016
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be granted parole pending his filing of a Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court.
KRISHNA SHANKAR BAKDE
STATE
VIPIN SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
