Rahul v. State

$~9.

• IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

• • W.P.(CRL) 3276/2016

RAHUL

..... Petitioner

Through: Mr. Jivesh Tiwari, Advocate versus STATE

..... Respondent Through: Mr. R.S. Kundu, ASC with Ms. Sneh Dhillon and Mr. Ankit Kr Gulia, Adv. with SI Yogenra Kr, PS Karol Bagh

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI

O R D E R % 02.12.2016

The petitioner has preferred the present petition to seek parole for a period of three months. Mr. Kundu points out that the petitioner has already been granted parole for 30 days on 28.10.2016.

In view of the aforesaid, this petition has become infructuous and the same is dismissed as such.

VIPIN SANGHI, J