Petitioner sought withdrawal of writ petition after the petitioner and respondent spoke in the chamber. Court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~11
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
RIHAN KHAN ALIAS RISHABH JAIN ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Arun Kumar Gupta and Mr. Achal Gupta, Advocates along with the petitioner in person
versus
| STATE GOVER | NMENT OF | NCT OF |
|---|---|---|
| DELHI & ORS. | ..... Respondent | |
| Through | Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing | |
| counsel (Crl.) with Mr. Amrit | ||
| Singh and Mr. S. Budakoti, | ||
| Advocate along with Inspector | ||
| Ram Avtar Yadav & WSI Preeti | ||
| Sharma, PS Model Town | ||
| Respondent-Shahzana in person | ||
| along with her father in person |
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA O R D E R
% 13.07.2016
father of Ms.Shahzana Khan was also called in the chamber and we have spoken to him.
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
SUNITA GUPTA, J.
JULY 13, 2016 rs
1 issue framed by the court
whether to allow withdrawal of the petition after the parties spoke in the chamber
Rihan Khan
Shahzana Khan
State Government of NCT of Delhi
Sanjiv Khanna
Sunita Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
