Neetu Singh v. State & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner and respondent no.3 stated they have resolved all disputes. Consequently, the court disposed of the writ petition with no substantive legal principles laid down.
What the court decided
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1908/2016 NEETU SINGH ..... Petitioner Through Petitioner in person versus STATE & ORS ..... Respondent Through Mr Rajesh Mahajan, ASC with Ms Parul Jamwal along with Insp. Devender Rathee PS Sarai Rohilla, Delhi Respondent No.3 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA O R D E R % 12.07.2016
Petitioner and respondent no.3 are present in person and it is stated by them that they have resolved all their disputes and differences.
In view of the aforesaid position, nothing survives in this petition. The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly.
SANJIV KHANNA, J
SUNITA GUPTA, J
JULY 12, 2016/ rd
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Neetu Singh
- respondent
State & Ors.
Coram
Sanjiv Khanna
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court