In a writ petition seeking parole for medical treatment of family members, the Delhi High Court rejected the prayer due to insufficient evidence regarding illness and recent furlough.
Parole prayer rejected; writ petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
GAJENDER SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.K.Singhal, Advocate.
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, A.S.C. for the State
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI
O R D E R % 19.01.2016
W.P.(CRL) 166/2016
Page 1 of 2
Alongwith the writ petition, no medical record has been annexed highlighting serious condition of his mother or wife requiring his release on parole or to show that the disease is being suffered by his wife and his mother subsequent to his availing furlough for a period of three weeks w.e.f. 23.10.2015 to 13.11.2015. Even as per the status report, the wife of the petitioner failed to produce any treatment record.
PRATIBHA RANI, J.
JANUARY 19, 2016
‘st’
W.P.(CRL) 166/2016
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's prayer for parole to attend to medical treatment of his wife and mother should be granted given previous furlough and lack of records.
Gajender Singh
State of NCT of Delhi
Pratibha Rani
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
