While the writ petition was pending, the petitioner sought to withdraw the matter. The High Court of Delhi allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition accordingly.
Leave to withdraw the petition granted; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~29
SHASHI SHEKHAR @ NEERAJ ..... Petitioner
Through: Ms Neha Kapoor, Advocate.
versus
STATE OF THE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel (Crl.) with Mr Jamal Akhtar, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL
O R D E R
% 19.01.2016
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition at this stage.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
JANUARY 19, 2016
mk
Shashi Shekhar @ Neeraj
State of the NCT of Delhi
Siddharth Mridul
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
