Allowed

Baij Nath Paswan & Ors. v. the State ( NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Delhi HC12 Jan 2016CRL.M.C./105/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court allowed a petition under Section 482 CrPC to quash an FIR after finding that the dispute was settled amicably via a compromise deed. The applicant was directed to deposit costs in the Prime Minister Relief Fund.

What did the court decide?

FIR No. 277/2014 under Sections 325/354/34 IPC and all proceedings arising therefrom were quashed. Petitioners directed to deposit ₹25,000 in PM Relief Fund.

Baij Nath Paswan & Ors. Vs the State ( NCT of Delhi) & Anr. — Cheque Dishonour | Delhi HC (2016)

¶1

$~28

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.M.C. 105/2016

¶4

BAIJ NATH PASWAN & ORS ..... Petitioners

¶5

Through : Mr.Ashok Tobria, Advocate with Mr.R.K.Mishra, Advocate.

¶6

versus THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through : Mr.Raghuvinder Varma, APP. Mr.M.S.Yadav, Advocate for R2 along with R2 in person. SI Veer Singh. Vashno Kumar – other injured is also present.

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

¶8

O R D E R

¶9

% 12.01.2016

¶10

CRL.M.A.No.462/2016 (Exemption)

¶11

Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.

¶12

The application stands disposed of.

¶13

CRL.M.C. 105/2016

¶14

Present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.277/2014 under Sections 325/354/34 IPC at PS Sagar Pur, Delhi. It is stated that the matter has been settled amicably with the complainant / respondent No.2 vide compromise deed dated 21.12.2015.

¶15

CRL.M.C.105/2016

¶16

page 1 of 2

¶17

Complainant / respondent No.2 is present with her counsel and has been identified by the Investigating Officer. Vashno Kumar – other injured is also present. I have enquired from the complainant if she has settled the dispute with the petitioners amicably without any fear or pressure. She has informed that all the disputes between the parties have been resolved amicably with her free consent and she has no objection to the quashing of the FIR in question.

¶18

The petition is supported by affidavits of the parties. Copy of compromise deed dated 21.12.2015 has been placed on record. Since the dispute between the parties has been settled, no useful purpose will be served to continue with the proceedings. In the interest of justice and to enable the parties to put an end to the litigation, FIR No.277/2014 under Sections 325/354/34 IPC at PS Sagar Pur, Delhi and all the proceedings arising therefrom are quashed.

¶19

The petitioners are directed to deposit ` 25,000/- as costs in the Prime Minister Relief Fund within two weeks. Registry shall ensure its compliance.

¶20

The petition stands disposed of accordingly.

¶21

S.P.GARG, J

¶22

JANUARY 12, 2016 / tr

¶23

page 2 of 2

¶24

CRL.M.C.105/2016

Baij Nath Paswan & Ors. v. the State ( NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Baij Nath Paswan & Ors. v. the State ( NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ganesh Chandel Vs the State ( NCT of Delhi)

Bhuwan Chandra Pandey & Anr. Vs State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Vijay Kumar Vs the State NCT of Delhi

Sonu Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi

Rahul Parikh Vs the State

Akhilesh Vs State