Petitioners admitted compliance with the impugned order. The High Court of Delhi treated the object of the contempt petition as satisfied and disposed of the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5
RAIS AHMED & ORS ..... Petitioners
Through Mr.Suresh Chand, Advocate.
versus
A K MITTAL & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr.Joydeep Mazumdar with Mr.Rohit Dutta, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
Learned counsel for the petitioner admits that order in question has been complied with.
Consequently, the present contempt petition stands disposed of as satisfied.
MANMOHAN, J
NOVEMBER 08, 2016 KA
RAIS AHMED & ORS
A K MITTAL & ORS
MANMOHAN
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
