This non-substantive order shows the petitioner withdrawing a contempt petition with liberty to file appropriate proceedings, resulting in its dismissal as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file appropriate proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1
MITHILESH SHARMA ..... Petitioner
Through Mr.Amit Kumar with Mr.D.K.Sharma, Advocates.
versus
VIDYA SAGAR & ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr.Pramod Gupta with Ms.Kashvi Datta, Advocates for R-1. Mr.Santosh Kumar Tripathi, ASC with Mr.Rizwan, Advocate for R- 2/GNCTD.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN O R D E R % 07.11.2016
After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file appropriate proceedings in accordance with law.
With the aforesaid liberty, present contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
MANMOHAN, J
NOVEMBER 07, 2016 KA
MITHILESH SHARMA
VIDYA SAGAR
ANR.
MANMOHAN
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
