The court disposed of the contempt petition as satisfied, noting that the impugned order had been complied with. No substantive legal issue was addressed.
The contempt petition was disposed of as satisfied.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1
M/S GANDHI IMPEX ..... Petitioner
Through Mr.V.S.Negi, Advocate.
versus
SM BHATNAGAR & ANR ..... Respondents Through Ms.Rajni Sharma, Advocate for R- 1 & 2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
O R D E R
% 17.10.2016
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the order in question has been complied with.
In view thereof, present contempt petition is disposed of as satisfied.
MANMOHAN, J
OCTOBER 17, 2016 KA
M/S Gandhi Impex
SM Bhatnagar & Anr
Manmohan
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
